Mitigating COVID-19’s Additional Disparate Impacts - Fair Housing and Lending Obligations Under the CARES Act
As data began pouring in from cities and states hit hard by COVID-19 it became clear that, even though the virus is color blind, certain racial and ethnic communities were suffering a disproportionate impact from the disease. See, e.g., https://www.npr.org/2020/04/09/831174878/racial-disparities-in-covid-19-impact-emerge-as-data-is-slowly-released, last visited on May 5, 2020. In particular, African Americans who contract COVID-19 have higher death rates, caused by underlying conditions and lack of access to health care. Id. Similarly, women- and minority-owned businesses may be disproportionately impacted by this crisis due to preexisting economic conditions such as lack of access to credit. See, e.g., https://www.mbda.gov/page/executive-summary-disparities-capital-access-between-minority-and-non-minority-businesses, last visited on May 5, 2020.
When Congress passed the CARES Act to provide desperately needed funds to impacted industries, they waived statutory and regulatory requirements that could delay the delivery of that aid. However, in recognition of the disparate conditions described above, Congress did not provide waivers of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3602 et. seq. and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et. seq.
The Fair Housing Act (FHA) prohibits discrimination in the sale or rental of housing because of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status and disability. With very few exceptions, homebuyers, homeowners, renters and prospective renters are protected from discrimination based on these classifications in all aspects of the financing and provision of housing. The FHA prohibits both intentional discrimination and policies and decisions that are not intentionally discriminatory, but have a disproportionate and adverse impact against a protected class. If a plaintiff is able to show that the disproportionate adverse impact exists, the burden shifts to the defendant to prove that there is a legitimate, non-discriminatory business need for the policy or decision.